<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jenel Systems and Design, Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://endeavorsunlimited.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://endeavorsunlimited.com</link>
	<description>Smalling Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Brief Overview of Quantum Computing</title>
		<link>http://endeavorsunlimited.com/?p=10</link>
		<comments>http://endeavorsunlimited.com/?p=10#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical and Scientific Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endeavorsunlimited.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost all of today&#8217;s computers are based on simple Turing Theory and employ Boolean logic based on binary mathematics. Even &#8220;parallel&#8221; computers are really complex Turing engines employing multiple computing modules which deal with pieces of incoming data (chunks, bytes, instructions, etc.). There has been some research into biological computing using enzymes or large-molecule systems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost all of today&#8217;s computers are based on simple Turing Theory and  employ Boolean logic based on binary mathematics. Even &#8220;parallel&#8221;  computers are really complex Turing engines employing multiple computing  modules which deal with pieces of incoming data (chunks, bytes,  instructions, etc.). There has been some research into biological  computing using enzymes or large-molecule systems as memory, shift  registers, etc., but this has not proven to be very practical.</p>
<p>Quantum computing is based on a different physics than digital  computing. Instead of having two (or three) states-per-element like  digital computers which are off, on, or neither, quantum computers can  have all three states at the same time. An 8-bit digital computer can  exist in only one of 256 states at a time while an eight bit quantum  computer can exist in all 256 states at a time and theoretically, work  on 256 calculations at once (quantum parallelism). Each of the 256  numbers in this 8-bit example has an equal probability of being measured  so that a quantum processor functions as a random number generator. The  actual register is representing all of these values at once but a  single value output only occurs at measurement. While a classical  digital computer would have to operate on each number from 0 to 255,  quantum computers require only one pass through the &#8220;processor&#8221;,  radically reducing calculation time. Of course, the larger the register  size, the larger the number &#8211; even a simple 10-bit quantum computer  could scream past a supercomputer.</p>
<p>Where the digital computer uses binary digits (bits), the quantum  computer uses qubits, but qubits are extremely difficult to generate. A  quantum switch must be undisturbed. Light, molecules, or impinging  fields required for the proper operation of a quantum computer depend on  the interaction of the various qubits without any outside influence.  When disturbed, the qubit becomes quite Newtonian rather than quantum  and selects a definite state &#8211; by chance becoming, dare we say, digital.</p>
<p>Paul Benioff of the Argonne National Laboratory first applied quantum  theory to computers in 1981 and David Deutsch of Oxford proposed  quantum parallel computers in 1985, years before the realization of  qubits in 1995. Qubits are made using various techniques. A group at the  national Institute of Standards in Boulder trapped a single atom with  missing electrons (an ion) with two energy levels by containing it with  magnetic and electric fields at -273 degrees C. Another group at  California Institute of Technology made qubits from polarized light  using a device which allows photons to interact while they pass though a  stream of cesium atoms interacting in an XOR-like manner. At Los  Alamos, researchers make qubits by trapping ions. Ion traps housing up  to six ions have already been produced &#8211; far short of the thousands  required for a useable quantum computer.</p>
<p>Although quantum computers have not been built to date, many of the  mechanisms required like error correction and algorithm construction are  being investigated. Because of their multiple states (unlike two-state  digital processes) quantum computers will have some of the problems that  analog computers had &#8211; namely error correction and calculation  reliability (although this does not sound very quantum mechanical).  Physicists are arguing what type of error correction will work with  qubits and quantum measurement in general. Believe it or not, John von  Neuman&#8217;s work in computer error detection and correction is being  re-examined and has led to new efforts in quantum error correction.</p>
<p>DARPA, funded a $5 million dollar Quantum Information and Computing  Institute for the purpose of investigating quantum computing and its  applications. It may be well into the 21st century before we see quantum  computing used at a commercial level but there is little doubt that the  research on new forms of calculation and error correction will improve  the state of digital computing, data compression, and error correction.</p>
<p><em>Elmer Smalling III</em></p>
<p>Copyright ©1999 Elmer Smalling III</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://endeavorsunlimited.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=10</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relativity in a Nutshell &#8211; A Synthesis</title>
		<link>http://endeavorsunlimited.com/?p=1</link>
		<comments>http://endeavorsunlimited.com/?p=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical and Scientific Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endeavorsunlimited.com/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Relativity, a general theory of physics developed by Einstein, Lorentz and other 19th and 20th century theoreticians, involves the analysis of the interdependence of time and space. The theory of relativity posits: 1. all observable motion is relative; 2. the velocity of light is constant and not dependent on the motion of the source of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relativity, a general theory of physics developed by Einstein,  Lorentz and other 19th and 20th century theoreticians, involves the  analysis of the interdependence of time and space. The theory of  relativity posits: 1. all observable motion is relative; 2. the velocity  of light is constant and not dependent on the motion of the source of  the light; 3. no energy can be transmitted at a velocity greater than  that of light; 4. the mass of a body in motion is a function of its  energy and varies with velocity; 5. time is relative; 6. space and time  are interdependent; 7. matter results in the warping of a space so that a  body in motion passing nearby will describe a curve (an example is the  deflection of light by gravity).</p>
<p>The purpose of the theory of relativity is to relate the measurements  of observers who are accelerated relative to each other and are not in  the same inertial system. Basically, relativity states that to an  observer, the physical effects of a gravitational field are  indistinguishable from the effects of an accelerated coordinate system.  Consider one observer in the Earth&#8217;s gravitational field and another in a  rocket ship accelerating in space. If they both drop a ball, they will  observe it accelerate to the floor. According to classical theory (Isaac  Newton), the Earth-based observer would attribute this to gravitational  force while the rocket-bound observer would attribute it to the  accelerated floor overtaking the uniformly moving ball. Einstein said  that the effects are identical and that a theory of gravity should  provide a description of both systems. The mathematical mechanics have  the same form for all observers, whether accelerated or not. This is the  important principle of equivalence that is the cornerstone to the  theory of relativity.</p>
<p>Relativity has to do with gravitational fields. In classical physics,  Isaac Newton said that the gravitational field of a body throughout  space can be described as a function of its instantaneous position which  assumes that gravitational effects propagate with infinite velocity.  Classical theory is &#8220;action-at-an-instance&#8221; theory. Einstein postulated  that no physical effect can propagate with a velocity greater than the  speed of light, and therefore disagreed with classical theory. His  proportion E=MC2 resulted from this work. Because gravitational fields  are so small, proving relativity has been difficult.</p>
<p><em>Elmer Smalling III</em></p>
<p>Copyright ©1997 Elmer Smalling III</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://endeavorsunlimited.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

